 Civil Liberties and Civil Rights (Back to top)
2007-2008 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 18 percent in 2007-2008. 2007-2008 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Arab American Institute's position, Representative Cantor received a rating of 0. 2007-2008 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 0 percent in 2007-2008. 2007-2008 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Leadership Conference on Civil Rights's position, Representative Cantor received a rating of 4. 2007-2008 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's position, Representative Cantor received a rating of 18 percent. 2007-2008 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association's position, Representative Cantor received a rating of 39 percent. 2007-2008 In 2007-2008 The Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans - Immigration gave Representative Cantor a rating of 0. 2007 In 2007 American Civil Liberties Union gave Representative Cantor a grade of 0. 2007 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Arab American Institute's position, Representative Cantor received a rating of 0. 2007 In 2007 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots gave Representative Cantor a rating of 0. 2007 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 7 percent in 2007. 2007 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the League of Women Voters 20 percent in 2007. 2007 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 20 percent in 2007. 2007 In 2007 National Council of La Raza gave Representative Cantor a grade of 0. 2006 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) 11 percent in 2006.
2006 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 4 percent in 2006.
2005-2006 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 5 percent in 2005-2006. 2005-2006 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 0 percent in 2005-2006. 2005-2006 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Iranian American Political Action Committee 0 percent in 2005-2006. 2005-2006 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 19 percent in 2005-2006.
2005 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 2 percent in 2005. 2005 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 0 percent in 2005. 2005 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 22 percent in 2005. 2005 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Council of La Raza 33 percent in 2005. 2004 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 0 percent in 2004. 2004 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Council of La Raza 50 percent in 2004. 2003-2004 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 0 percent in 2003-2004. 2003-2004 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 0 percent in 2003-2004. 2003-2004 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 11 percent in 2003-2004. 2003-2004 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the League of United Latin American Citizens 22 percent in 2003-2004. 2003-2004 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 27 percent in 2003-2004. 2003 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the American Library Association 100 percent in 2003. 2003 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 0 percent in 2003. 2003 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 11 percent in 2003. 2003 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 20 percent in 2003. 2001-2002 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 7 percent in 2001-2002. 2001-2002 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 0 percent in 2001-2002. 2001-2002 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 0 percent in 2001-2002. 2001-2002 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 0 percent in 2001-2002. 2001-2002 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the League of United Latin American Citizens 0 percent in 2001-2002. 2001-2002 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 28 percent in 2001-2002. 2001 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 0 percent in 2001. 2001 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 0 percent in 2001. 2001 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the League of United Latin American Citizens 0 percent in 2001. 2001 Representative Cantor supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 29 percent in 2001.
How to Interpret these Evaluations:
(Back to top)
Project Vote Smart collects performance evaluations from special interest groups who provide them, regardless of issue or bias. If you have any comments concerning performance evaluations or know of a group that provides ratings not included here, please contact us at ratings@vote-smart.org.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups are biased. They do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
|
|