Abortion Issues

(Back to top)

2004  Based on voting records and a questionnaire in 2004, NARAL Pro-Choice New York considers the position of Senator Kruger to be mixed.

2003-2006  Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to New York State Right to Life Committee's position, Senator Kruger received a rating of 33.

2002  Based on voting records and a questionnaire in 2002, NARAL Pro-Choice New York considers the position of Senator Kruger to be mixed.

2000  Based on voting records and a questionnaire by NARAL Pro-Choice New York in 2000, Senator Kruger voted or expressed the organization's preferred position 100 percent of the time.

1999-2002  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York State Right to Life Committee 33 percent in 1999-2002.

1999-2001  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York State Right to Life Committee 0 percent in 1999-2001.

Animal Rights and Wildlife Issues

(Back to top)

2007-2008  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Humane Society of New York 90 percent in 2007-2008.

2003-2004  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Humane Society of New York 50 percent in 2003-2004.

Business and Consumers

(Back to top)

2007-2008  Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to New York National Federation of Independent Business's position, Senator Kruger received a rating of 100.

2006  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Business Council of New York State, Inc. C percent in 2006.

2006  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York National Federation of Independent Business 60 percent in 2006.

2003-2004  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York National Federation of Independent Business 58 percent in 2003-2004.

2001-2002  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York National Federation of Independent Business 63 percent in 2001-2002.

1999-2000  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York National Federation of Independent Business 58 percent in 1999-2000.

1997-1998  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York National Federation of Independent Business 78 percent in 1997-1998.

1996  On the votes that New York National Federation of Independent Business considered to be the most important in 1996, Senator Kruger voted their preferred position 58 percent of the time.

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

(Back to top)

2000  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Empire State Pride Agenda 67 percent in 2000.

1998  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Empire State Pride Agenda 50 percent in 1998.

1997  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York Civil Liberties Union 33 percent in 1997.

1997  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York Civil Liberties Union 33 percent in 1997.

1996  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York Civil Liberties Union 20 percent in 1996.

Conservative

(Back to top)

2008  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Conservative Party of New York State 30 percent in 2008.

2007  Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Conservative Party of New York State's position, Senator Kruger received a rating of 60.

2006  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Conservative Party of New York State 44 percent in 2006.

2005  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Conservative Party of New York State 64 percent in 2005.

2004  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Conservative Party of New York State 55 percent in 2004.

2003  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Conservative Party of New York State 27 percent in 2003.

1998  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Christian Coalition of New York 73 percent in 1998.

1998  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Conservative Union 70 percent in 1998.

1997  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Conservative Union 52.38 percent in 1997.

Environmental Issues

(Back to top)

2008  Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to EPL-Environmental Advocates's position, Senator Kruger received a rating of 72.

2007  Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to EPL-Environmental Advocates's position, Senator Kruger received a rating of 72.

2006  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 62 percent in 2006.

2005  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 54 percent in 2005.

2004  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 83 percent in 2004.

2003  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 70 percent in 2003.

2002  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 85 percent in 2002.

2001  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 67 percent in 2001.

2000  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 80 percent in 2000.

1999  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 44 percent in 1999.

1997  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the EPL-Environmental Advocates 74 percent in 1997.

Gun Issues

(Back to top)

2008  In 2008 National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund gave Senator Kruger a grade of F.

2008  In 2008 New Yorkers Against Gun Violence gave Senator Kruger a grade of C, in its scorecard for candidates seeking office in 2008.

2006  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all state legislative candidates in 2006, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund assigned Senator Kruger a grade of F (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

2004  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all state legislative candidates in 2004, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund assigned Senator Kruger a grade of F (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

2004  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New Yorkers Against Gun Violence 100 percent in 2004.

2002  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all state legislative candidates in 2002, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund assigned Senator Kruger a grade of F (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

2002  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New Yorkers Against Gun Violence 100 percent in 2002.

2000  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all state legislative candidates in 2000, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund assigned Senator Kruger a grade of F (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

1998  Based on a questionnaire and the votes that National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund considered to be the most important in 1998, they have assigned Senator Kruger a grade of F (with grades ranging from a high of A++ to a low of F-).

Labor

(Back to top)

2003-2004  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Public Employees Federation 100 percent in 2003-2004.

2001-2002  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2001-2002.

1999-2000  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York AFL-CIO 100 percent in 1999-2000.

Liberal

(Back to top)

2006  Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to New York City Americans for Democratic Action's position, Senator Kruger received a rating of 30.

1996  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the New York City Americans for Democratic Action 68 percent in 1996.

1995  On the votes that New York City Americans for Democratic Action considered to be the most important in 1995, Senator Kruger voted their preferred position 56 percent of the time.

Social Issues

(Back to top)

2001-2005  Senator Kruger supported the interests of the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy 69 percent in 2001-2005.

How to Interpret these Evaluations: (Back to top) Project Vote Smart collects performance evaluations from special interest groups who provide them, regardless of issue or bias. If you have any comments concerning performance evaluations or know of a group that provides ratings not included here, please contact us at ratings@vote-smart.org. Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups are biased. They do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group. Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.