 Abortion Issues (Back to top)
2008 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of Planned Parenthood 100 percent in 2008. 2007-2008 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 0 percent in 2007-2008. 2007 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2007. 2006 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2006. 2006 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 100 percent in 2006. 2005-2006 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association 93 percent in 2005-2006. 2005-2006 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 0 percent in 2005-2006. 2005 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2005. 2004 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2004. 2003-2004 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the Democrats for Life of America 0 percent in 2003-2004. 2003-2004 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 0 percent in 2003-2004. 2003 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2003. 2001-2002 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 0 percent in 2001-2002. 2001 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2001. 1996-2003 Secretary Clinton supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 100 percent in 1996-2003. 1995-2004 On the votes that the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association considered to be the most important in 1995-2004, Secretary Clinton voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.
|
How to Interpret these Evaluations:
(Back to top)
Project Vote Smart collects performance evaluations from special interest groups who provide them, regardless of issue or bias. If you have any comments concerning performance evaluations or know of a group that provides ratings not included here, please contact us at ratings@vote-smart.org.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups are biased. They do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
|
|
Print
Share