Interest Group Evaluations
Interest Group Evaluations
Richard 'Rick' J. Santorum
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion Issues
- Agriculture Issues
- Animal Rights and Wildlife Issues
- Arts and Humanities
- Budget, Spending and Taxes
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Election Issues
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Congressional and Legislative Affairs
- Conservative
- Crime Issues
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drug Issues
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy Issues
- Environmental Issues
- Executive Branch
- Family and Children Issues
- Federal, State, and Local Relations
- Foreign Aid and Policy Issues
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Reform
- Gun Issues
- Health Issues
- Housing and Property Issues
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Labor
- Legal Issues
- Liberal
- Military Issues
- National Security Issues
- Reproductive Issues
- Science and Medical Research
- Senior and Social Security Issues
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Social Issues
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade Issues
- Transportation Issues
- Veterans Issues
- Welfare and Poverty
- Women's Issues
Abortion Issues
Agriculture Issues
| 2003-2004 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 11% |
| 2001-2002 | Minnesota Farm Bureau - Positions | 67% |
| 2001-2002 | Minnesota Farm Bureau - Positions | 75% |
| 2001-2002 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 30% |
| 2000 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 100% |
| 1999-2000 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 27% |
| 1999 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 40% |
| 1998 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 60% |
| 1997 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 43% |
| 1996 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 40% |
| 1995-1996 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 79% |
| 1995 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 40% |
| 1994 | National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score | 38% |
Animal Rights and Wildlife Issues
Budget, Spending and Taxes
Business and Consumers
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Conservative
Crime Issues
| 1999-2000 | Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants - Positions | 25% |
| 1995-1996 | Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants - Positions | 11% |
Education
Energy Issues
| 2005-2006 | Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score | 17% |
| 2002 | American Coalition for Ethanol - Positions | 0% |
Environmental Issues
Family and Children Issues
| 2005 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 11% |
| 2004 | American Family Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2004 | Family Research Council - Positions | 100% |
| 2003-2004 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 9% |
| 2003 | American Family Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2003 | Family Research Council - Positions | 100% |
| 2003 | National Network for Youth - Positions | 0% |
| 2002 | American Family Voices - Positions | 12% |
| 2001-2002 | Family Research Council - Positions | 89% |
| 2001 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 18% |
| 2000 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 30% |
| 2000 | Family Research Council - Positions | 100% |
| 1999-2000 | Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions | 80% |
| 1999 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 26% |
| 1998 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 22% |
| 1997-1998 | Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions | 60% |
| 1997 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 27% |
| 1996 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 20% |
Foreign Aid and Policy Issues
Government Reform
Gun Issues
| 2005 | Gun Owners of America - Positions | 0% |
| 2003-2004 | Gun Owners of America - Positions | 50% |
| 2003 | Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - Lifetime Score | 6% |
| 2002 | Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - Lifetime Score | 6% |
| 2001-2002 | Gun Owners of America - Positions on Gun Rights | 0% |
| 2000 | National Rifle Association - Lifetime Score | A+ |
| 1999-2000 | Coalition to Stop Gun Violence - Positions | 0% |
| 1999-2000 | Gun Owners of America - Positions on Gun Rights | 0% |
| 1987-1999 | Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - Positions | 8% |
Health Issues
Immigration
| 2006 | American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions | 11% |
| 2005-2006 | Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions | 93% |
| 2005-2006 | United States Border Control - Positions | 91% |
| 2005 | Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions | 75% |
| 2003-2006 | Americans for Better Immigration - Positions | 50% |
| 2003-2005 | Americans for Better Immigration - Positions | 0% |
| 2002 | American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions | 0% |
| 1996-1998 | Americans for Immigration Control - Positions | 0% |
| 1996 | Americans for Immigration Control - Positions | 15% |
| 1996 | Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions | 25% |
| 1995-2004 | American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions | 47% |
| 1989-2003 | Americans for Better Immigration - Lifetime Score | 24% |
| 1989-2002 | Americans for Better Immigration - Lifetime Score | 24% |
| 1989-2001 | Americans for Better Immigration - Lifetime Score | 24% |
Labor
Legal Issues
| 2001-2002 | American Bar Association - Positions | 0% |
| 1999-2000 | American Bar Association - Positions | 0% |
Liberal
Military Issues
National Security Issues
| 2003-2004 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 100% |
| 2003-2004 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 94% |
| 2002 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 75% |
| 1998-2002 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 90% |
| 1997 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 64% |
| 1996 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 86% |
Science and Medical Research
| 2004 | Parkinsons Action Network - Positions | 100% |
| 2003 | American Society of Anesthesiologists - Positions | 100% |
| 2003 | Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology - Positions | 33% |
Senior and Social Security Issues
Social Issues
Technology and Communication
| 2006 | CNET News - Positions | 33% |
| 2005-2006 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 100% |
| 2003-2004 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 100% |
| 2002 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 83% |
| 2000 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 90% |
| 1999 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 100% |
Trade Issues
| 2003-2004 | The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score | 0% |
| 2003-2004 | USA Engage - Positions | 60% |
| 2001-2002 | The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score | 100% |
| 2001-2002 | The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score | 100% |
| 2001-2002 | USA Engage - Positions | 40% |
| 1999-2000 | The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score | 73% |
| 1997-1998 | The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score | 50% |
Transportation Issues
| 2003-2004 | American Road and Transportation Builders Association - Positions | 38% |
Veterans Issues
| 2006 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 40% |
| 2006 | The Retired Enlisted Association - Retired Military Benefits Issues Score | 6% |
| 2005 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 33% |
| 2004 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 0% |
| 2004 | The Retired Enlisted Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2003-2004 | Vietnam Veterans of America - Positions | 100% |
| 2003 | The American Legion - Positions | 100% |
| 2001 | Vietnam Veterans of America - Positions | 76% |
| 1999 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 100% |
| 1997-1998 | Vietnam Veterans of America - Positions | 0% |
Welfare and Poverty
| 2003-2004 | Bread for the World - Positions | 100% |
| 2003-2004 | The Partnership for the Homeless - Positions | 100% |
| 2001-2002 | Bread for the World - Positions | 100% |
| 2000 | Bread for the World - Positions | 0% |
| 1999 | Bread for the World - Positions | 0% |
| 1998 | Bread for the World - Positions | 67% |
| 1997 | Bread for the World - Positions | 0% |
| 1996 | Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger | 14% |
Women's Issues
| 2005 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 0% |
| 2003-2004 | Business and Professional Women USA - Positions | 46% |
| 2003-2004 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 10% |
| 2003 | Business and Professional Women USA - Positions | 40% |
| 2001-2002 | Business and Professional Women USA - Positions | 11% |
| 1998 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 0% |
Conservative
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
2012 Endorsements
- Ben Lange
- Brad Thor
- Cary Gordon Stands
- Christopher Conley
- Dave Mustaine
- Deborah Long
- Ed Morrissey
- Greg Spero
- Halley Griess
- Jason Antosz
- Jeanine Notter
- Lenette Peterson
- Matt Swank
- Sam Clovis
- Sharron Angle
- Ted Maravelias
- Walt Rogers
- Wes Shuler