Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Interest Group Evaluations

Interest Group Evaluations

Representative Mazie K. Hirono

Current Office: U.S. House - District 2, Democratic
First Elected: 11/07/2006
Last Elected: 11/02/2010
Next Election: 2012

Business and Consumers

2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 25%
2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 13%
2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 37%
2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 20%
2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 33%
2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 55%
2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 0%
2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 33%
2008 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 10%
2008 The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 56%
2008 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 51%
2007-2008 American Forest and Paper Association - Forest Products Advocacy Score 33%
2007-2008 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 62%
2007-2008 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 10%
2007-2008 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 20%
2007-2008 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 60
2007-2008 National Restaurant Association - Positions on Restaurant Advocacy 40
2007-2008 National Retail Federation - Positions Retail Industry Advocacy 20%
2007-2008 National Small Business Association - Positions 69%
2007-2008 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 70%
2007 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 0%
2007 Consumer Alliance for Energy Security - Positions 0%
2007 The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2007 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 0%
2007 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 45%

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 22%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 89%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 9%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 11%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 7%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 91%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 90%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 4%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 9%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 15%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 85%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 29%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 14%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 30%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 12%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 0
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 13%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 5%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 8%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 17%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 12.7%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 6%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 36%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 0
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots - Regressive Conservative Action Score 0

Health Issues

2010 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - House of Representatives Score 50%
2010 American Public Health Association - Positions 100%
2010 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology - U.S. House Score 0%
2009-2010 American Hospital Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Saint Joseph Health System - Positions 100%
2009 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions 66%
2009 American Nurses Association - Positions 100%
2009 American Public Health Association - Positions 100%
2009 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology - Positions 100%
2009 Association of University Centers on Disabilites - Positions 88%
2009 The Children's Health Fund - Positions 66%
2008 American Public Health Association - Positions 100%
2008 The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society - U.S. House Score 100%
2007-2008 American Hospital Association - Positions 86%
2007-2008 National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Saint Joseph Health System - Positions 100
2007 Alliance For Headache Disorders Advocacy - Positions 0%
2007 American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions 100%
2007 American Public Health Association - Positions 100%
2007 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology - Positions 100%
2007 Association of University Centers on Disabilites - Positions 60%
2007 Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance - Positions 50
2007 League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score 100%
2007 The Children's Health Fund - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions 25%

Labor

2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 80%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2010 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score 100%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 80%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 100%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 100%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 97%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 100%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2008 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2008 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2008 The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2008 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 70
2007-2008 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2007 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2007 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 96%
2007 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2007 Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Int - Positions 100%
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2007 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 83%
2007 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2007 The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions 0%
2007 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 0%
2007 United Auto Workers - Positions 100%
2007 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 100

Liberal

2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 89%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 11%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 7%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 91%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 9%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 90%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots - Progressive Action Score 69%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots - Regressive Action Score 5%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 15%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 70%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 85%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 87%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 91%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 85%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 82%
2008 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 88%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots - Progressive Action Score 76%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 55%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 87.3%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 77%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 82%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.