| Current Office: | U.S. House - District 2, Democratic |
|---|---|
| First Elected: | 11/07/2006 |
| Last Elected: | 11/02/2010 |
| Next Election: | 2012 |
| Current Office: | U.S. House - District 2, Democratic |
|---|---|
| First Elected: | 11/07/2006 |
| Last Elected: | 11/02/2010 |
| Next Election: | 2012 |
| 2010 | NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions | 100% |
| 2010 | Planned Parenthood - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - House of Representatives Score | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 0% |
| 2008 | Planned Parenthood - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 33% |
| 2009-2010 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 100% |
| 2008 | National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions | 93% |
| 2007-2008 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 84% |
| 2007-2008 | National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score | 100 |
| 2007 | National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions | 93% |
| 2007 | National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | United Fresh Produce Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2010 | Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Society for Animal Protective Legislation - U.S. House Score | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions | 93% |
| 2009 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions | 92% |
| 2008 | Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions | 0 |
| 2007-2008 | Big Cat Rescue - Positions | 66 |
| 2007-2008 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 93% |
| 2007-2008 | Society for Animal Protective Legislation - U.S. House Score | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection | 100% |
| 2007 | The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection | 100 |
| 2007 | League of Women Voters - Campaign Finance and Election Issues Score | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Drug Policy Alliance Network - House of Representatives Score | 75% |
| 2007-2008 | National Association of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 50% |
| 2008 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | National Employment Lawyers Association - Positions | 66% |
| 2007-2008 | Alliance to Stop the War on the Poor - Positions on Affordable Energy | 0% |
| 2007 | Consumer Alliance for Energy Security - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | League of Women Voters - Energy Score | 100% |
| 2010 | League of Conservation Voters - Positions | 100% |
| 2010 | League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score | 95% |
| 2009-2010 | League of Conservation Voters - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Environment America - Positions | 93% |
| 2009 | League of Conservation Voters - Positions | 100% |
| 2008 | Environment America - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 93% |
| 2007-2008 | League of Conservation Voters - Positions | 91% |
| 2007 | Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions | 90% |
| 2007 | League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score | 90% |
| 2007 | League of Private Property Voters - Land Rights Advocacy Score | 0 |
| 2009-2010 | American Family Association - Positions | 11% |
| 2009 | The Children's Health Fund - Positions | 66% |
| 2009 | Vote Kids - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | American Family Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | Family Research Council - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | School Nutrition Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | The Arc - Positions | 57% |
| 2007 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | Family Research Council - Positions | 0 |
| 2007 | League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score | 100% |
| 2009 | The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions | 20% |
| 2010 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 20% |
| 2010 | Peace Action - Positions | 75% |
| 2010 | Peace Action West - Positions | 75% |
| 2009-2010 | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions | 80% |
| 2009 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 50% |
| 2009 | Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions | 45% |
| 2009 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 25% |
| 2009 | NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy | 8% |
| 2009 | Peace Action West - Positions | 67% |
| 2008 | Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions | 100% |
| 2008 | Peace Action West - Positions | 90% |
| 2007-2008 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | Council for a Livable World - Positions | 87% |
| 2007-2008 | Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions | 77% |
| 2007 | Council for a Livable World - Positions | 92% |
| 2007 | Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 40% |
| 2007 | Peace Action West - Positions | 91% |
| 1991-2009 | Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - Lifetime Score | 100% |
| 1988-2008 | Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - Lifetime Score | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | United States English - U.S. House Score | 17% |
| 2007-2010 | National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions | 8% |
| 2007 | English First - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | Fleet Reserve Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Military Officers Association of America - Positions | 100% |
| 2008 | Fleet Reserve Association - Positions | 37% |
| 2007 | Fleet Reserve Association - Positions | 66% |
| 2010 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 20% |
| 2009 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 50% |
| 2007-2008 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 30% |
| 2007-2008 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 4% |
| 2001-2010 | Keep America Safe - Positions | 6% |
| 2008 | CNET News - Positions | 80% |
| 2007-2008 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 57% |
| 2007 | AeA - Positions | 75% |
| 2007 | Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions | 82% |
| 2009-2010 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | USA Engage - Positions | 40% |
| 2008 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | Associated Equipment Distributors - Positions | 85% |
| 2007 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 0% |
| 2010 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 80% |
| 2009 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 50% |
| 2007-2008 | Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score | 70 |
| 2007-2008 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 70% |
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 2002 - 2012 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc.